{"id":"jezyk-angielski-2012-maj-matura-dwujezyczna/zad/10","paper_id":"jezyk-angielski-2012-maj-matura-dwujezyczna","number":"10","points":15,"ptype":"open","subject":"jezyk-angielski","category":"matura","year":2012,"month":"maj","level":null,"text":"Task 10. (15 points)\nChoose one of the topics below. Write a composition following the conventions\nof the genre indicated in the topic. Use between 300 and 350 words.\n1. Coraz więcej osób domaga się zaostrzenia kar dla młodocianych przestępców. Napisz\nrozprawkę, w której przedstawisz swoją opinię na ten temat, uwzględniając argumenty\nodnoszące się do:\nbezpieczeństwa\nkosztów\nsprawiedliwości społecznej.\n2. Ostatnie badania wykazały spadek zainteresowania młodych ludzi teatrem. Napisz\nartykuł do czasopisma młodzieżowego, w którym przedstawisz swoją opinię na temat\nprzyczyn tego zjawiska, omówisz zalety uczestnictwa młodych ludzi w spektaklach\nteatralnych i polecisz przedstawienie, które ostatnio oglądałeś/łaś.\ndla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych\n12\ndla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych\n13\ndla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych\n14\nZgodność z poleceniem\nSpójność\ni logika\nZakres\nśrodków\njęzykowych\nPoprawność\nśrodków\njęzykowych\nOgółem\n0-1-2-3-4-5\n0-1-2\n0-1-2-3-4\n0-1-2-3-4\nElementy treści (0-1-2)\nElementy formy (0-1)\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n1\n2\n3\n4\ndla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych\n15\nNOTES (will not be assessed)","answer":null,"answer_text":null,"solution":"Writing task (choice of two topics; graded by an examiner on content/coherence/range/accuracy, 300-350 words). Sample worked answer to Topic 1 (rozprawka/discursive essay on harsher punishments for young offenders, covering safety, costs and social justice as required):\n\nShould Punishments for Young Offenders Be Made Harsher?\n\nIn recent years, the number of crimes committed by teenagers has been rising steadily, and more and more people are calling for tougher sentences for young offenders. In my opinion, while the intention behind this demand is understandable, simply making punishments harsher is not the right solution.\n\nFirstly, as far as safety is concerned, supporters of stricter penalties argue that removing young criminals from the streets for longer periods would make communities safer. However, research consistently shows that harsher prison sentences rarely reduce reoffending. Teenagers who spend years in prison often come out more hardened and better connected to criminal networks than before, which can make society less safe in the long run rather than more.\n\nSecondly, there is the question of cost. Building and running prisons is extremely expensive, and keeping young people locked up for extended periods places a huge financial burden on taxpayers. That money could instead be invested in rehabilitation programmes, education and psychological support, which have been proven to be far more cost-effective at preventing young people from returning to crime.\n\nThirdly, from the point of view of social justice, we must remember that young offenders are, first and foremost, children who are still developing both physically and mentally. Many of them come from difficult family backgrounds, poverty or situations involving abuse and neglect. Treating them exactly like adult criminals ignores the fact that their circumstances, not just their choices, often lead them towards crime. A justice system that offers a genuine chance of rehabilitation is fairer than one based purely on punishment.\n\nIn conclusion, although the desire for tougher sentences comes from a real concern about safety, I believe that investing in prevention, education and rehabilitation is a more effective and more just approach to dealing with youth crime than simply increasing the severity of punishments.","image":"img/jezyk-angielski-2012-maj-matura-dwujezyczna/zad-10.webp","solution_image":null,"topics":null,"page_from":11,"source":"ai","answer_source":null,"answer_text_source":null,"solution_source":"ai","text_source":"ocr","source_label":"Język angielski · Matura · maj 2012","subject_label":"Język angielski","category_label":"Matura","text_html":"<p>Task 10. (15 points)<br>Choose one of the topics below. Write a composition following the conventions<br>of the genre indicated in the topic. Use between 300 and 350 words.</p>\n<ol><li>Coraz więcej osób domaga się zaostrzenia kar dla młodocianych przestępców. Napisz</li></ol>\n<p>rozprawkę, w której przedstawisz swoją opinię na ten temat, uwzględniając argumenty<br>odnoszące się do:<br>bezpieczeństwa<br>kosztów<br>sprawiedliwości społecznej.</p>\n<ol><li>Ostatnie badania wykazały spadek zainteresowania młodych ludzi teatrem. Napisz</li></ol>\n<p>artykuł do czasopisma młodzieżowego, w którym przedstawisz swoją opinię na temat<br>przyczyn tego zjawiska, omówisz zalety uczestnictwa młodych ludzi w spektaklach<br>teatralnych i polecisz przedstawienie, które ostatnio oglądałeś/łaś.<br>dla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych<br>12<br>dla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych<br>13<br>dla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych<br>14<br>Zgodność z poleceniem<br>Spójność<br>i logika<br>Zakres<br>środków<br>językowych<br>Poprawność<br>środków<br>językowych<br>Ogółem<br>0-1-2-3-4-5<br>0-1-2<br>0-1-2-3-4<br>0-1-2-3-4<br>Elementy treści (0-1-2)<br>Elementy formy (0-1)<br>1<br>2<br>3<br>4<br>5<br>6<br>1<br>2<br>3<br>4<br>dla absolwentów klas dwujęzycznych<br>15<br>NOTES (will not be assessed)</p>","solutions":[{"source":"ai","label":"AI","kind":"text","html":"<p>Writing task (choice of two topics; graded by an examiner on content/coherence/range/accuracy, 300-350 words). Sample worked answer to Topic 1 (rozprawka/discursive essay on harsher punishments for young offenders, covering safety, costs and social justice as required):</p>\n<p>Should Punishments for Young Offenders Be Made Harsher?</p>\n<p>In recent years, the number of crimes committed by teenagers has been rising steadily, and more and more people are calling for tougher sentences for young offenders. In my opinion, while the intention behind this demand is understandable, simply making punishments harsher is not the right solution.</p>\n<p>Firstly, as far as safety is concerned, supporters of stricter penalties argue that removing young criminals from the streets for longer periods would make communities safer. However, research consistently shows that harsher prison sentences rarely reduce reoffending. Teenagers who spend years in prison often come out more hardened and better connected to criminal networks than before, which can make society less safe in the long run rather than more.</p>\n<p>Secondly, there is the question of cost. Building and running prisons is extremely expensive, and keeping young people locked up for extended periods places a huge financial burden on taxpayers. That money could instead be invested in rehabilitation programmes, education and psychological support, which have been proven to be far more cost-effective at preventing young people from returning to crime.</p>\n<p>Thirdly, from the point of view of social justice, we must remember that young offenders are, first and foremost, children who are still developing both physically and mentally. Many of them come from difficult family backgrounds, poverty or situations involving abuse and neglect. Treating them exactly like adult criminals ignores the fact that their circumstances, not just their choices, often lead them towards crime. A justice system that offers a genuine chance of rehabilitation is fairer than one based purely on punishment.</p>\n<p>In conclusion, although the desire for tougher sentences comes from a real concern about safety, I believe that investing in prevention, education and rehabilitation is a more effective and more just approach to dealing with youth crime than simply increasing the severity of punishments.</p>"}]}