{"id":"jezyk-angielski-2017-maj-matura-dwujezyczna/zad/8","paper_id":"jezyk-angielski-2017-maj-matura-dwujezyczna","number":"8","points":null,"ptype":"open","subject":"jezyk-angielski","category":"matura","year":2017,"month":"maj","level":null,"text":"TASK 8. (0-5)\nRead the text. For questions 8.1-8.5, use the word given in brackets to form a word that\nfits the gap. The text must be logical and correct in both grammar and spelling.\nWrite the missing word in the space provided.\nARE JELLYFISH GOING TO TAKE OVER THE OCEANS?\nAnother British summer and another set of headlines about swarms of jellyfish set to ruin your\nholiday. But news that jellyfish numbers may be rising carries 8.1. (IMPLY)\nfar beyond the interrupted pastimes of the sunburnt masses.\nJellyfish seem to thrive on the chaos humans create. Overfishing wipes out the creature’s\npredators and 8.2. (CONSIDER) warmer water, resulting from climate\nchange, contributes to their spread. Another problem is pollution from fertilisers, which leads\nto the loss of oxygen in the oceans. It turns out that jellyfish are incredibly tolerant of\nthis 8.3. (DEPRIVE) , much more than other sea creatures.\nAnd the great mixing of species transported across the world in the ballasts of ships opens up\nnew, vulnerable ecosystems to these super-adaptors.\nHowever, because of the paucity of historical records, many jellyfish experts are\n8.4. (HESITATE) in declaring whether a global trend exists.\nHeadlines dating back as far as 1906 show that all through the decades there were periods when\nthe numbers of jellyfish in certain locations were described as 8.5. (PRECEDENCE)\nbut that doesn’t prove that their population worldwide is growing.\nIn all likelihood, we are going to see more jellyfish, but whether or not we are doomed to oceans\ndominated by them is hard to say at the moment.\nadapted from www.theguardian.com\nMAD-1A","answer":null,"answer_text":"8. W ocenie poprawności środków językowych w wypowiedziach zdających ze stwierdzoną\ndysleksją nie bierze się pod uwagę błędów ortograficznych i interpunkcyjnych.\nBłąd ortograficzny zmieniający znaczenie wyrazu w pracy zdającego z opinią o dysleksji to\nbłąd językowy. Jest on brany pod uwagę w ocenie poprawności językowej.\nZasady te obowiązują również w ocenie prac uczniów z dysgrafią, dysortografią, afazją,\nz zaburzeniami komunikacji językowej, mózgowym porażeniem dziecięcym, a także prac\nzdających, którzy korzystali z pomocy nauczyciela wspomagającego oraz prac pisanych na\nkomputerze.","solution":null,"image":"img/jezyk-angielski-2017-maj-matura-dwujezyczna/zad-8.webp","solution_image":null,"topics":null,"page_from":13,"source":"ocr","answer_source":null,"answer_text_source":"ocr","solution_source":null,"text_source":"ocr","source_label":"Język angielski · Matura · maj 2017","subject_label":"Język angielski","category_label":"Matura","text_html":"<p>TASK 8. (0-5)<br>Read the text. For questions 8.1-8.5, use the word given in brackets to form a word that<br>fits the gap. The text must be logical and correct in both grammar and spelling.<br>Write the missing word in the space provided.<br>ARE JELLYFISH GOING TO TAKE OVER THE OCEANS?<br>Another British summer and another set of headlines about swarms of jellyfish set to ruin your<br>holiday. But news that jellyfish numbers may be rising carries 8.1. (IMPLY)<br>far beyond the interrupted pastimes of the sunburnt masses.<br>Jellyfish seem to thrive on the chaos humans create. Overfishing wipes out the creature’s<br>predators and 8.2. (CONSIDER) warmer water, resulting from climate<br>change, contributes to their spread. Another problem is pollution from fertilisers, which leads<br>to the loss of oxygen in the oceans. It turns out that jellyfish are incredibly tolerant of<br>this 8.3. (DEPRIVE) , much more than other sea creatures.<br>And the great mixing of species transported across the world in the ballasts of ships opens up<br>new, vulnerable ecosystems to these super-adaptors.<br>However, because of the paucity of historical records, many jellyfish experts are<br>8.4. (HESITATE) in declaring whether a global trend exists.<br>Headlines dating back as far as 1906 show that all through the decades there were periods when<br>the numbers of jellyfish in certain locations were described as 8.5. (PRECEDENCE)<br>but that doesn’t prove that their population worldwide is growing.<br>In all likelihood, we are going to see more jellyfish, but whether or not we are doomed to oceans<br>dominated by them is hard to say at the moment.<br>adapted from www.theguardian.com<br>MAD-1A</p>","answer_text_html":"<ol><li>W ocenie poprawności środków językowych w wypowiedziach zdających ze stwierdzoną</li></ol>\n<p>dysleksją nie bierze się pod uwagę błędów ortograficznych i interpunkcyjnych.<br>Błąd ortograficzny zmieniający znaczenie wyrazu w pracy zdającego z opinią o dysleksji to<br>błąd językowy. Jest on brany pod uwagę w ocenie poprawności językowej.<br>Zasady te obowiązują również w ocenie prac uczniów z dysgrafią, dysortografią, afazją,<br>z zaburzeniami komunikacji językowej, mózgowym porażeniem dziecięcym, a także prac<br>zdających, którzy korzystali z pomocy nauczyciela wspomagającego oraz prac pisanych na<br>komputerze.</p>","solutions":[]}