{"id":"jezyk-angielski-2025-maj-matura-rozszerzona/zad/6","paper_id":"jezyk-angielski-2025-maj-matura-rozszerzona","number":"6","points":8,"ptype":"closed","subject":"jezyk-angielski","category":"matura","year":2025,"month":"maj","level":"rozszerzona","text":"Zadanie 6. (0-8)\nPrzeczytaj dwa teksty związane ze szkoleniem psów. Wykonaj zadania 6.1.-6.8.\nzgodnie z poleceniami.\nTekst 1.\nBUSTER\n“Will, if you’re looking for a great dog, Buster is the one you want,” Nick assured me.\nThe next morning, I woke up with schoolboy excitement. I was going to meet my new dog\nsoon. I felt as though it was Christmas morning and presents were waiting for me under\nthe tree. Whether Buster would be equally delighted to meet me remained to be seen.\nHe was three years old and I was about to become his third handler. As a military working\ndog, he could still have three or four other people to call master, before his retirement.\nWhen I reached Buster’s accommodation, he was pacing around, every now and again\nlooking up to see who was coming. He gave me a very cool glance and his face expressed\nsomething that I could only describe as annoyed disapproval. I got the distinct feeling that he\nwas decidedly unimpressed with me. Not to worry, I had some dog treats that were bound to\nbreak that ice.\n“Sit. Wait. Go!” I was right. The first treat disappeared without a trace. I’m not sure if it was\nthe treat that made the difference, but whatever it was, Buster was soon a very changed dog.\nHe was round my legs as if they were covered in juicy steaks. He was so bouncy, happy and\nready for his walk, his breakfast and a bit of fun. Nick was right, this dog really knew all the\nropes and all the tricks, and he was only three years old! I wondered how many others he\nhad fooled with his “I’m so upset” act before he managed to get his tasty treat. A part of me\nadmired Buster for seeing right through me and reaching for the food.\nBuster was the dog I wanted to spend the next six months with; who I could imagine sharing\nmy most intimate and fearful moments with. Running cheerfully at my heels, he looked\nconfident, and I was pleased, but this was the moment of truth: if I released him from his\nlead, would he stay with me or would he run like the wind? Waddo, like most airfields, is\nhome to a million wild rabbits, and so far that morning they must have wondered why the\nnew recruit wasn’t trying to chase them. Even when I let him off the lead, Buster paid no\nattention to them and for me that was very promising. If free-running rabbits didn’t bother\nhim, he was less likely to get distracted from his future job in the place to which we were\nabout to be sent.\nNa podstawie: Will Barrow, Buster. The Dog Who Saved a Thousand Lives, London 2015.\nMJAP-R0-100\nW zadaniach 6.1.-6.4. z podanych odpowiedzi wybierz właściwą, zgodną z treścią\ntekstu. Zakreśl jedną z liter: A, B, C albo D.\n6.1. From the first paragraph, we learn that\nA. Will became Buster’s owner at Christmas.\nB. Buster had just finished his military career.\nC. Will was uncertain how Buster would react to him.\nD. Buster had worked with three different people before Will got him.\n6.2. When Will met Buster for the first time, he\nA. had a plan for how to make the dog like him.\nB. noticed the dog respected him right from the start.\nC. was worried that the dog might unexpectedly attack him.\nD. saw the dog was too scared to leave his accommodation.\n6.3. What do we learn from the third paragraph?\nA. Will was impressed with the dog’s cleverness.\nB. Will tried to win Buster over by feeding him a steak.\nC. The dog quickly managed to learn how to pull a rope.\nD. Despite getting treats, the dog disobeyed Will’s commands.\n6.4. From the last paragraph, we can conclude that Will\nA. thought the dog required additional training.\nB. believed he and Buster could make a good team.\nC. found the dog too nervous for the job they were about to do.\nD. realized he shouldn’t have used treats to train a military dog.\nPRZENIEŚ ROZWIĄZANIA ZADAŃ OD 6.1. DO 6.4. NA KARTĘ ODPOWIEDZI!\nMJAP-R0-100\nTekst 2.\nThe Academy for Dog Trainers\nencourages those wishing to develop their dog-handling skills\nto apply for this award-winning course.\nWHAT WE EXPECT\nSince our course is\nprovided online, you\nmust be competent at\nnavigating websites, as\nwell as at recording\nand uploading videos.\nYou must also have\na good Internet\nconnection and\na phone or digital\ncamera to make films.\nWHAT YOU WILL LEARN\nA major component of the\nprogram involves obedience1\ntraining for fearful and\nunsociable dogs. You’ll learn\nabout genetics, dog breeds\nand how to market a dog\ntraining business. Our course\nalso covers managing\naggression in dogs, a skill\nwhich is typically ignored in\nother courses.\nHOW YOU PROGRESS\nOur program usually takes two\nyears and is divided into four\nlevels. You’ll have six months\nto complete each of them. If\nyou find you’re flying through\nthe material and we are\nsatisfied with your training\nskills, you can advance to the\nnext level sooner. You must\ndemonstrate you’ve achieved\nthe required standard before\nyou progress to the next level.\nWHAT WE REQUIRE\nYou must submit videos that\ndemonstrate your skills in\ntraining specific behaviours\nand pass the knowledge test\nfor each level.\nIn the event that you fail the\ntest, you will not be able to\ncontinue in the program. If this\nhappens before the third level,\n50% of the course fee is\nrefundable. Otherwise, the full\namount you have paid for the\ncourse is kept by the Academy.\nHOW MUCH WE CHARGE\nTo be considered for the\ncourse, you must pay a $75\nnon-refundable application fee.\nThe standard course fee is\n$8,500, made up of an initial\npayment of $3,500 upon\nregistration, followed by $5,000\nto be paid after two months.\nThe course fee is lowered to\n$7,500 if the whole sum is\npre-paid before the course\nstarts.\nNa podstawie: www.academyfordogtrainers.com\nŹródło: connectbehaviour.co.uk\n1 Obedience - posłuszeństwo.\nMJAP-R0-100\nUzupełnij luki 6.5.-6.8. zgodnie z treścią tekstu, tak aby jak najbardziej precyzyjnie\noddać jego sens. Luki należy uzupełnić w języku angielskim.\nUwaga: w każdą lukę możesz wpisać maksymalnie sześć wyrazów.\nTO APPLY OR NOT TO APPLY FOR THE COURSE?\nPROS\nThe course content includes working with 6.5.\n, which is rarely dealt with in other courses.\nIf you fulfil the requirements for a given level, you will be able to 6.6.\nthan is normally the case.\nCONS\nIf you don’t 6.7. at the end\nof the third or fourth level, the Academy won’t refund any money.\nIf you can’t afford to pay the entire amount in advance, the course will\n6.8.\nMJAP-R0-100","answer":null,"answer_text":"6. Opisanie problemu, który jest tematem rozprawki, np. stwierdzenie, że pojawił się\npomysł, by zajęcia na uczelniach odbywały się wyłącznie online, nie jest tezą,\nnp. Nowadays many young people prefer to study online. There is even an idea that\nuniversity studies should be conducted exclusively online.\n7. Zdający może odnieść się do wszystkich uczelni lub jednej wybranej.","solution":"Odpowiedź: **6.1.** — **C** **6.2.** — **A** **6.3.** — **A** **6.4.** — **B** **6.5.** — `aggressive dogs` (komponent dotyczący agresywnego zachowania psów) **6.6.** — `advance to the next level faster/sooner` (możliwość wcześniejszego/szybszego przejścia na kolejny poziom kursu) **6.7.** — `pass the (knowledge) test` (zdać test wiedzy) **6.8.** — `cost more / not be discounted` (kurs byłby droższy / cena nie uwzględniałaby zniżki)\n\nStrategia: zadanie hybrydowe (8 punktów)\n\nNajwięcej punktów z całej sekcji czytania — łączy 4 zamknięte ABCD (6.1.–6.4.) z 4 otwartymi lukami w wiadomości (6.5.–6.8.) na podstawie informacji z 4 tekstów A-D o kursach dla dog-trainerów.\n\n6.1.–6.4. — ABCD\n\nKażde pytanie wskazuje na jeden z tekstów. Pytania konkretne (III.4) + wnioskowanie (III.7).\n\n6.5.–6.8. — uzupełnij wiadomość\n\nWiadomość streszcza ofertę kursów. Twoja praca to uzupełnić luki na podstawie informacji z konkretnego tekstu A-D, używając angielskich wyrażeń spójnych gramatycznie i logicznie z otoczeniem luki.\n\nDla zdających z dysleksją\n\nAkceptowane: 6.5. agresion in dogs, 6.6. advans to the next level sooner, 6.7. pas the test, 6.8. be more expensiv.\n\nPunktacja CKE\n\n- 1 pkt — poprawna odpowiedź (za każde z 6.1.–6.8.).\n- 0 pkt — odpowiedź niepoprawna albo brak odpowiedzi.\n- Maksymalnie 8 pkt.\n\nTypowy błąd: **6.5.** Dystraktory z klucza CKE: `fearful and unsociable dogs / dogs' emotions / aggressive management / (disobedient) dogs / animals / your dog online / devices like phone or digital camera / good internet connection` = 0 pkt (niezgodne z tekstem). `aggression / aggressive behaviour / managing aggression / dangerous dogs / dogs / animals` = 0 pkt (nieprecyzyjne). `aggrecion` = 0 pkt (błąd zakłócający komunikację). `a skill / obedience (training) / genetics / managing dogs / aggressive managing / aggressive dogs' managing / aggression dogs` = 0 pkt (niejasne). **Akceptowane**: `aggressive dogs` (kanon), `aggression in dogs`, `dog / dog's / dogs' aggression`, `dogs full of aggression`, `dogs which are aggressive`, `dogs that have problem(s) with aggression`, `dogs' aggressive behaviour`, `dogs with aggressive behaviour`, `aggressive dog behaviours`, `dogs manifesting aggressive behaviour`, `aggressive behaviour in dogs`, `aggressiveness in dogs`, `hostile/angry dogs`, `aggressive dogs and managing their behaviours`. Z błędem: `agresive dogs / aggressiv dogs / agresion in dogs` (dopuszczalny brak końcowego `e` lub podwojenia). **6.6.** **Akceptowane**: `progress to the next one sooner`, `attend the following one sooner`, `move to/get to/reach the next level sooner`, `start/do the next level sooner`, `advance for/on the next level faster`, `jump to/skip to the next level sooner`, `move on / move further / go forward / advance / progress faster`, `advance through the course sooner`, `go up a level sooner`, `level up sooner`, `upgrade your level sooner`, `access the next level faster`, `advance to the next level earlier/quicker`, `pass to another level faster`, `complete it faster / more quickly`. **Odrzucone**: `progress to the next level / fly to the next level quickly / advanced to the next level quicker` (niespójne z luką), `change a level faster / skip the next level sooner / finish the course quicker/faster / fly through the material faster / become a dog trainer faster / get promotion sooner` (niezgodne z tekstem), `go faster/sooner / be quicker / jump sooner` (nieprecyzyjne), `advance to the next **lever** sooner` (zmiana znaczenia — `lever` = dźwignia, nie `level`). **6.7.** **Akceptowane**: `manage to pass the test(s) / the exam(s)`, `succeed in the test`, `pass the test (given)`, `come through the test successfully`. Z błędem: `pass test`. **Odrzucone**: `fail the test` (przeciwny sens), `submit videos / train specific behaviours / pay for the course` (niezgodne), `take / sit / do the test / make it through the test / meet the requirements of the course / achieve the required standard / demonstrate your achievement / pass` (nieprecyzyjne), `continue the course / fly through the material` (niejasne), `submit videos and pass the knowledge test for each level` (przekroczony limit), `pass the test after / pass the test and discontinue course` (niespójne z luką). **6.8.** **Akceptowane**: `cost you more (in total)`, `be more expensive (for you)`, `cost (you) $1,000 more`, `be $1,000 more expensive`, `cost much more`, `be much pricier`, `cost the standard amount (of money)`, `cost more than (the) pre-paid one`, `increase in price`, `not be ($1,000) cheaper`, `amount to/cost (you) $8,500` / `amount to $8,575` / `cost 8,500` (akceptowane z lub bez opłaty wstępnej $75). Z błędem: `be charged at the standard fee / have the standard fee / cost the standard fee`. **Odrzucone**: `be non-refundable / be lowered (to $7,500) / not start for you / be paid after two months / allow you to pay later / cost 8,500 pounds / be slightly more expensive` (niezgodne), `pay more / you will spend more money / be divided into two payments/charges / split into two payments / not give you lowered fee / not be lowered / charge you ($1,000) more / allow you to divide the payment` (niespójne z luką), `offer an initial payment / be more / be expensive / cost higher / not give you the lower(ed) fee / not to be lowered to $7,500 / up to $8,500 / make up of an initial payment / make you pay more / split your price / add up additional $1,000 to sum / apply higher fees / be non-refundable application fee / be cheaper if sum is pre-paid` (niejasne), `be made up of an initial payment and followed by $5,000` (przekroczony limit).","image":"img/jezyk-angielski-2025-maj-matura-rozszerzona/zad-6.webp","solution_image":null,"topics":"czytanie PR, 4 teksty (kursy dog-trainerów) + wiadomość z lukami","page_from":10,"source":"ocr","answer_source":null,"answer_text_source":"ocr","solution_source":"maturaonline","text_source":"ocr","source_label":"Język angielski · Matura · maj 2025 (rozszerzona)","subject_label":"Język angielski","category_label":"Matura","text_html":"

Zadanie 6. (0-8)
Przeczytaj dwa teksty związane ze szkoleniem psów. Wykonaj zadania 6.1.-6.8.
zgodnie z poleceniami.
Tekst 1.
BUSTER
“Will, if you’re looking for a great dog, Buster is the one you want,” Nick assured me.
The next morning, I woke up with schoolboy excitement. I was going to meet my new dog
soon. I felt as though it was Christmas morning and presents were waiting for me under
the tree. Whether Buster would be equally delighted to meet me remained to be seen.
He was three years old and I was about to become his third handler. As a military working
dog, he could still have three or four other people to call master, before his retirement.
When I reached Buster’s accommodation, he was pacing around, every now and again
looking up to see who was coming. He gave me a very cool glance and his face expressed
something that I could only describe as annoyed disapproval. I got the distinct feeling that he
was decidedly unimpressed with me. Not to worry, I had some dog treats that were bound to
break that ice.
“Sit. Wait. Go!” I was right. The first treat disappeared without a trace. I’m not sure if it was
the treat that made the difference, but whatever it was, Buster was soon a very changed dog.
He was round my legs as if they were covered in juicy steaks. He was so bouncy, happy and
ready for his walk, his breakfast and a bit of fun. Nick was right, this dog really knew all the
ropes and all the tricks, and he was only three years old! I wondered how many others he
had fooled with his “I’m so upset” act before he managed to get his tasty treat. A part of me
admired Buster for seeing right through me and reaching for the food.
Buster was the dog I wanted to spend the next six months with; who I could imagine sharing
my most intimate and fearful moments with. Running cheerfully at my heels, he looked
confident, and I was pleased, but this was the moment of truth: if I released him from his
lead, would he stay with me or would he run like the wind? Waddo, like most airfields, is
home to a million wild rabbits, and so far that morning they must have wondered why the
new recruit wasn’t trying to chase them. Even when I let him off the lead, Buster paid no
attention to them and for me that was very promising. If free-running rabbits didn’t bother
him, he was less likely to get distracted from his future job in the place to which we were
about to be sent.
Na podstawie: Will Barrow, Buster. The Dog Who Saved a Thousand Lives, London 2015.
MJAP-R0-100
W zadaniach 6.1.-6.4. z podanych odpowiedzi wybierz właściwą, zgodną z treścią
tekstu. Zakreśl jedną z liter: A, B, C albo D.
6.1. From the first paragraph, we learn that
A. Will became Buster’s owner at Christmas.
B. Buster had just finished his military career.
C. Will was uncertain how Buster would react to him.
D. Buster had worked with three different people before Will got him.
6.2. When Will met Buster for the first time, he
A. had a plan for how to make the dog like him.
B. noticed the dog respected him right from the start.
C. was worried that the dog might unexpectedly attack him.
D. saw the dog was too scared to leave his accommodation.
6.3. What do we learn from the third paragraph?
A. Will was impressed with the dog’s cleverness.
B. Will tried to win Buster over by feeding him a steak.
C. The dog quickly managed to learn how to pull a rope.
D. Despite getting treats, the dog disobeyed Will’s commands.
6.4. From the last paragraph, we can conclude that Will
A. thought the dog required additional training.
B. believed he and Buster could make a good team.
C. found the dog too nervous for the job they were about to do.
D. realized he shouldn’t have used treats to train a military dog.
PRZENIEŚ ROZWIĄZANIA ZADAŃ OD 6.1. DO 6.4. NA KARTĘ ODPOWIEDZI!
MJAP-R0-100
Tekst 2.
The Academy for Dog Trainers
encourages those wishing to develop their dog-handling skills
to apply for this award-winning course.
WHAT WE EXPECT
Since our course is
provided online, you
must be competent at
navigating websites, as
well as at recording
and uploading videos.
You must also have
a good Internet
connection and
a phone or digital
camera to make films.
WHAT YOU WILL LEARN
A major component of the
program involves obedience1
training for fearful and
unsociable dogs. You’ll learn
about genetics, dog breeds
and how to market a dog
training business. Our course
also covers managing
aggression in dogs, a skill
which is typically ignored in
other courses.
HOW YOU PROGRESS
Our program usually takes two
years and is divided into four
levels. You’ll have six months
to complete each of them. If
you find you’re flying through
the material and we are
satisfied with your training
skills, you can advance to the
next level sooner. You must
demonstrate you’ve achieved
the required standard before
you progress to the next level.
WHAT WE REQUIRE
You must submit videos that
demonstrate your skills in
training specific behaviours
and pass the knowledge test
for each level.
In the event that you fail the
test, you will not be able to
continue in the program. If this
happens before the third level,
50% of the course fee is
refundable. Otherwise, the full
amount you have paid for the
course is kept by the Academy.
HOW MUCH WE CHARGE
To be considered for the
course, you must pay a $75
non-refundable application fee.
The standard course fee is
$8,500, made up of an initial
payment of $3,500 upon
registration, followed by $5,000
to be paid after two months.
The course fee is lowered to
$7,500 if the whole sum is
pre-paid before the course
starts.
Na podstawie: www.academyfordogtrainers.com
Źródło: connectbehaviour.co.uk
1 Obedience - posłuszeństwo.
MJAP-R0-100
Uzupełnij luki 6.5.-6.8. zgodnie z treścią tekstu, tak aby jak najbardziej precyzyjnie
oddać jego sens. Luki należy uzupełnić w języku angielskim.
Uwaga: w każdą lukę możesz wpisać maksymalnie sześć wyrazów.
TO APPLY OR NOT TO APPLY FOR THE COURSE?
PROS
The course content includes working with 6.5.
, which is rarely dealt with in other courses.
If you fulfil the requirements for a given level, you will be able to 6.6.
than is normally the case.
CONS
If you don’t 6.7. at the end
of the third or fourth level, the Academy won’t refund any money.
If you can’t afford to pay the entire amount in advance, the course will
6.8.
MJAP-R0-100

","answer_text_html":"
  1. Opisanie problemu, który jest tematem rozprawki, np. stwierdzenie, że pojawił się
\n

pomysł, by zajęcia na uczelniach odbywały się wyłącznie online, nie jest tezą,
np. Nowadays many young people prefer to study online. There is even an idea that
university studies should be conducted exclusively online.

\n
  1. Zdający może odnieść się do wszystkich uczelni lub jednej wybranej.
","solutions":[{"source":"maturaonline","label":"matura-online.pl","kind":"text","html":"

Odpowiedź: 6.1. — C 6.2. — A 6.3. — A 6.4. — B 6.5. — aggressive dogs (komponent dotyczący agresywnego zachowania psów) 6.6. — advance to the next level faster/sooner (możliwość wcześniejszego/szybszego przejścia na kolejny poziom kursu) 6.7. — pass the (knowledge) test (zdać test wiedzy) 6.8. — cost more / not be discounted (kurs byłby droższy / cena nie uwzględniałaby zniżki)

\n

Strategia: zadanie hybrydowe (8 punktów)

\n

Najwięcej punktów z całej sekcji czytania — łączy 4 zamknięte ABCD (6.1.–6.4.) z 4 otwartymi lukami w wiadomości (6.5.–6.8.) na podstawie informacji z 4 tekstów A-D o kursach dla dog-trainerów.

\n

6.1.–6.4. — ABCD

\n

Każde pytanie wskazuje na jeden z tekstów. Pytania konkretne (III.4) + wnioskowanie (III.7).

\n

6.5.–6.8. — uzupełnij wiadomość

\n

Wiadomość streszcza ofertę kursów. Twoja praca to uzupełnić luki na podstawie informacji z konkretnego tekstu A-D, używając angielskich wyrażeń spójnych gramatycznie i logicznie z otoczeniem luki.

\n

Dla zdających z dysleksją

\n

Akceptowane: 6.5. agresion in dogs, 6.6. advans to the next level sooner, 6.7. pas the test, 6.8. be more expensiv.

\n

Punktacja CKE

\n\n

Typowy błąd: 6.5. Dystraktory z klucza CKE: fearful and unsociable dogs / dogs' emotions / aggressive management / (disobedient) dogs / animals / your dog online / devices like phone or digital camera / good internet connection = 0 pkt (niezgodne z tekstem). aggression / aggressive behaviour / managing aggression / dangerous dogs / dogs / animals = 0 pkt (nieprecyzyjne). aggrecion = 0 pkt (błąd zakłócający komunikację). a skill / obedience (training) / genetics / managing dogs / aggressive managing / aggressive dogs' managing / aggression dogs = 0 pkt (niejasne). Akceptowane: aggressive dogs (kanon), aggression in dogs, dog / dog's / dogs' aggression, dogs full of aggression, dogs which are aggressive, dogs that have problem(s) with aggression, dogs' aggressive behaviour, dogs with aggressive behaviour, aggressive dog behaviours, dogs manifesting aggressive behaviour, aggressive behaviour in dogs, aggressiveness in dogs, hostile/angry dogs, aggressive dogs and managing their behaviours. Z błędem: agresive dogs / aggressiv dogs / agresion in dogs (dopuszczalny brak końcowego e lub podwojenia). 6.6. Akceptowane: progress to the next one sooner, attend the following one sooner, move to/get to/reach the next level sooner, start/do the next level sooner, advance for/on the next level faster, jump to/skip to the next level sooner, move on / move further / go forward / advance / progress faster, advance through the course sooner, go up a level sooner, level up sooner, upgrade your level sooner, access the next level faster, advance to the next level earlier/quicker, pass to another level faster, complete it faster / more quickly. Odrzucone: progress to the next level / fly to the next level quickly / advanced to the next level quicker (niespójne z luką), change a level faster / skip the next level sooner / finish the course quicker/faster / fly through the material faster / become a dog trainer faster / get promotion sooner (niezgodne z tekstem), go faster/sooner / be quicker / jump sooner (nieprecyzyjne), advance to the next lever sooner (zmiana znaczenia — lever = dźwignia, nie level). 6.7. Akceptowane: manage to pass the test(s) / the exam(s), succeed in the test, pass the test (given), come through the test successfully. Z błędem: pass test. Odrzucone: fail the test (przeciwny sens), submit videos / train specific behaviours / pay for the course (niezgodne), take / sit / do the test / make it through the test / meet the requirements of the course / achieve the required standard / demonstrate your achievement / pass (nieprecyzyjne), continue the course / fly through the material (niejasne), submit videos and pass the knowledge test for each level (przekroczony limit), pass the test after / pass the test and discontinue course (niespójne z luką). 6.8. Akceptowane: cost you more (in total), be more expensive (for you), cost (you) $1,000 more, be $1,000 more expensive, cost much more, be much pricier, cost the standard amount (of money), cost more than (the) pre-paid one, increase in price, not be ($1,000) cheaper, amount to/cost (you) $8,500 / amount to $8,575 / cost 8,500 (akceptowane z lub bez opłaty wstępnej $75). Z błędem: be charged at the standard fee / have the standard fee / cost the standard fee. Odrzucone: be non-refundable / be lowered (to $7,500) / not start for you / be paid after two months / allow you to pay later / cost 8,500 pounds / be slightly more expensive (niezgodne), pay more / you will spend more money / be divided into two payments/charges / split into two payments / not give you lowered fee / not be lowered / charge you ($1,000) more / allow you to divide the payment (niespójne z luką), offer an initial payment / be more / be expensive / cost higher / not give you the lower(ed) fee / not to be lowered to $7,500 / up to $8,500 / make up of an initial payment / make you pay more / split your price / add up additional $1,000 to sum / apply higher fees / be non-refundable application fee / be cheaper if sum is pre-paid (niejasne), be made up of an initial payment and followed by $5,000 (przekroczony limit).

"},{"source":"maturazai","label":"maturazai.pl (AI)","kind":"text","html":"

6.1. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
C - Will was uncertain how Buster would react to him.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

W pierwszym akapicie kluczowy fragment:

\n
"I felt as though it was Christmas morning and presents were waiting for me under the tree. Whether Buster would be equally delighted to meet me remained to be seen. He was three years old and I was about to become his third handler."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. Whether Buster would be equally delighted remained to be seen = niewiadome czy będzie zachwycony → niepewność.
  2. remained to be seen = pozostawało do zobaczenia (niepewne).
  3. equally (jak ja) - Will jest zachwycony, ale Buster może nie.
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź C.

\n

Sposób 2 - eliminacja błędnych opcji

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.1, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - odpowiedź C
- 0 pkt - A, B lub D; brak odpowiedzi; kilka liter
- Podstawa programowa: III.4) Zdający znajduje w tekście określone informacje.
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - wyrażenia niepewności:
- remain(s) to be seen = pozostaje do zobaczenia
- Whether X is/would Y = czy X jest/byłby Y
- I wonder if = zastanawiam się czy

📖 Reference - become someone's Nth handler:
Trzeci handler = 2 osoby wcześniej, NIE 3.
\n

Dlaczego inne odpowiedzi są błędne

\n

| Opcja | Treść | Dlaczego błędna | Typowa pułapka |
| A | became owner at Christmas | Christmas to PORÓWNANIE nastroju, nie data | Dosłowne czytanie metafor |
| B | just finished military career | Tekst: still have before his retirement | Niedokładne czytanie 'still' |
| C | uncertain how Buster would react | POPRAWNA - 'remained to be seen' | - |
| D | worked with 3 different people before | Tekst: third handler = 2 osoby wcześniej | Mylenie pozycji w sekwencji |

\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: third handler (trzeci) = 2 osoby PRZED. Nie 3 osoby wcześniej, lecz Will jest 3-cim w kolejności.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Porównanie like Christmas morning = METAFORA NASTROJU, nie data wydarzenia.
\n

6.2. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
A - Will had a plan for how to make the dog like him.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

W drugim akapicie kluczowy fragment:

\n
"He gave me a very cool glance and his face expressed something that I could only describe as annoyed disapproval. I got the distinct feeling that he was decidedly unimpressed with me. Not to worry, I had some dog treats that were bound to break that ice."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. Not to worry = nie ma problemu - Will pewny siebie.
  2. I had some dog treats = MIAŁ plan (smakołyki).
  3. bound to break that ice = na pewno przełamią lody (bound to = na pewno).
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź A.

\n

Sposób 2 - eliminacja błędnych opcji

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.2, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - odpowiedź A
- 0 pkt - B, C lub D; brak odpowiedzi; kilka liter
- Podstawa programowa: III.4) Zdający znajduje w tekście określone informacje.
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - break the ice:
Idiom: break the ice = przełamać lody, zbudować relację. Tu Will używa smakołyków jako narzędzia do tego celu.

📖 Reference - be bound to V:
be bound to + V = na pewno coś zrobi (silne przekonanie).
\n

Dlaczego inne odpowiedzi są błędne

\n

| Opcja | Treść | Dlaczego błędna | Typowa pułapka |
| A | had a plan to make dog like him | POPRAWNA - dog treats | - |
| B | dog respected him from start | Tekst: annoyed disapproval, unimpressed | Pomylenie pierwszego wrażenia psa |
| C | worried dog might attack | Brak takich obaw, Will Not to worry | Wymyślanie scenariuszy |
| D | dog too scared to leave | Buster was pacing around | Nadinterpretacja cool glance |

\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Idiom break the ice = przełamać lody. Tu metaforycznie o nawiązaniu pierwszego kontaktu.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: dog treats = przysmaki dla psa, a NIE 'treats' (potraktowanie). Klucz wymaga rozpoznania kolokacji.
\n

6.3. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
A - Will was impressed with the dog's cleverness.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

W trzecim akapicie kluczowe fragmenty:

\n
"Nick was right, this dog really knew all the ropes and all the tricks, and he was only three years old!"
\n
"A part of me admired Buster for seeing right through me and reaching for the food."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. knew all the ropes and all the tricks = znał wszystkie sztuczki/wiedział co robić.
  2. only three years old = tylko 3 lata - wzmocnienie sugerujące podziw.
  3. A part of me admired Buster for seeing right through me = podziwiałem za przejrzenie mnie na wylot.
  4. reaching for the food = po prostu sięgnął po jedzenie (sprytnie).
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź A.

\n

Sposób 2 - eliminacja błędnych opcji

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.3, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - odpowiedź A
- 0 pkt - B, C lub D; brak odpowiedzi; kilka liter
- Podstawa programowa: III.4) Zdający znajduje w tekście określone informacje.
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - idiomy:
- know the ropes = znać się na rzeczy, mieć doświadczenie
- see (right) through someone = przejrzeć kogoś, zobaczyć przez podstęp
- as if they were covered in steaks = jak gdyby były pokryte stekami (porównanie, nie steaks)
\n

Dlaczego inne odpowiedzi są błędne

\n

| Opcja | Treść | Dlaczego błędna | Typowa pułapka |
| A | impressed with cleverness | POPRAWNA - admired, saw through me | - |
| B | fed him a steak | Tekst: as if covered in juicy steaks (PORÓWNANIE) | Dosłowne czytanie idiomu |
| C | learned to pull a rope | knew all the ropes to IDIOM | Dosłowne czytanie idiomu |
| D | disobeyed commands | Buster wykonał Sit. Wait. Go! | Wymyślanie scenariusza |

\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: know the ropes = znać się na rzeczy (idiom). NIE dosłowne 'znać liny'.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: as if they were covered in juicy steaks to PORÓWNANIE - nogi Will-a NIE były pokryte stekami, pies tak SIĘ ZACHOWYWAŁ.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: see right through someone = przejrzeć kogoś na wylot (psychologicznie). Tu Buster zrozumiał, że Will chce go zwabić smakołykami.
\n

6.4. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
B - believed he and Buster could make a good team.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

W ostatnim akapicie kluczowe fragmenty:

\n
"Buster was the dog I wanted to spend the next six months with; who I could imagine sharing my most intimate and fearful moments with."
\n
"Running cheerfully at my heels, he looked confident, and I was pleased"
\n
"If free-running rabbits didn't bother him, he was less likely to get distracted from his future job"
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. wanted to spend the next six months with = chęć współpracy = dobry zespół.
  2. sharing my most intimate and fearful moments with = zaufanie.
  3. I was pleased = zadowolenie z zachowania psa.
  4. less likely to get distracted from his future job = pies będzie dobrze pracował.
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź B.

\n

Sposób 2 - eliminacja błędnych opcji

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.4, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - odpowiedź B
- 0 pkt - A, C lub D; brak odpowiedzi; kilka liter
- Podstawa programowa: III.7) Zdający wyciąga wnioski.
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - wnioskowanie 'good team':
- share intimate and fearful moments with = zaufanie
- looked confident = pewny siebie
- was pleased = zadowolenie
- less likely to get distracted = dobrze wykona pracę

Wszystkie te sygnały razem → wniosek o GOOD TEAM.
\n

Dlaczego inne odpowiedzi są błędne

\n

| Opcja | Treść | Dlaczego błędna | Typowa pułapka |
| A | required additional training | Will jest pleased, brak wzmianki o treningu | Nadinterpretacja |
| B | could make a good team | POPRAWNA - wanted to spend 6 months, pleased, confident | - |
| C | too nervous for job | Tekst: looked confident, less likely to get distracted | Pominięcie sygnałów pewności |
| D | shouldn't have used treats | Brak refleksji w tekście o regrecie | Wymyślanie morału |

\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Pytania z we can conclude wymagają WNIOSKOWANIA - łącz sygnały (was pleased + looked confident + wanted to spend 6 months → good team).
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: at my heels = za moimi piętami, idzie tuż za mną. To znak posłuszeństwa i więzi.
\n

6.5. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
aggressive dogs (lub: aggression in dogs, managing aggression in dogs).

\n

Luka 6.5.: The course content includes working with AGGRESSIVE DOGS, which is rarely dealt with in other courses.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

Kluczowy fragment z opisu kursu:

\n
"Our course also covers managing aggression in dogs, a skill which is typically ignored in other courses."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. managing aggression in dogs = praca z agresywnymi psami.
  2. typically ignored in other courses = rzadko poruszane w innych kursach (= rarely dealt with in other courses).
  3. PARAFRAZA: aggression in dogs ↔ aggressive dogs.
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź aggressive dogs (lub aggression in dogs).

\n

Sposób 2 - analiza gramatyczna luki

\n

W notatce: working with 6.5.

\n

working with + ??? wymaga RZECZOWNIKA (osoba/grupa):

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.5, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - aggressive dogs (forma oczekiwana)
- Akceptowane: aggression in dogs, dogs' aggression, dogs full of aggression, dogs which are aggressive, dogs with aggressive behaviour, hostile/angry dogs, managing aggression in dogs, aggressive dog management
- Z dopuszczalnym błędem: agresive dogs, aggresive dogs (literówki ortograficzne)
- WYKLUCZONE (0 pkt): fearful and unsociable dogs (z innego fragmentu), dogs' emotions, obedience training, genetics, managing dogs, sam aggression (bez psów), sam dogs (bez agresji), dangerous dogs (z innego pola znaczeniowego)
- Dysleksja: agresion in dogs (akceptowane)
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - kolokacje z aggression/aggressive:
- aggression in dogs = agresja u psów
- aggressive dogs = agresywne psy
- managing aggression = zarządzanie agresją
- hostile/angry dogs = wrogie/złośliwe psy

Spelling: aggressive = 2× g, 2× s + ive (NIE agressive, NIE aggresive).
\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: SPELLING aggressive = AG-GRES-SIVE (podwójne g, podwójne s). Pojedyncze g lub s = błąd ortograficzny.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: PUŁAPKA fearful and unsociable dogs - to fragment z tekstu, ALE odpowiedź na inne pytanie (nie agresywne, lecz lękliwe). Klucz NIE akceptuje tej odpowiedzi.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Sam aggression (bez dogs) jest niewystarczająco precyzyjny - luka pyta CZYJEJ agresji.
\n

6.6. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
advance to the next level faster/sooner (lub: progress to the next level sooner, move to the next level sooner).

\n

Luka 6.6.: If you fulfil the requirements for a given level, you will be able to ADVANCE TO THE NEXT LEVEL FASTER than is normally the case.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

Kluczowy fragment z sekcji HOW YOU PROGRESS:

\n
"You'll have six months to complete each of them. If you find you're flying through the material and we are satisfied with your training skills, you can advance to the next level sooner."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. you can advance to the next level sooner = możesz przejść do następnego poziomu szybciej.
  2. If you find you're flying through the material = jeśli szybko opanowujesz materiał = if you fulfil the requirements.
  3. than is normally the case = niż zwykle (6 miesięcy).
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź advance to the next level faster/sooner.

\n

Sposób 2 - analiza gramatyczna luki

\n

W notatce: you will be able to 6.6. than is normally the case

\n

be able to + V (infinitive):

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.6, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - advance to the next level faster/sooner (forma oczekiwana)
- Akceptowane: progress/move/get to/reach the next level sooner/faster, jump to/skip to the next level sooner, advance through the course sooner, go up a level sooner, level up sooner, access the next level faster, complete it faster
- Z dopuszczalnym błędem: advanse to the next level faster, progres to the next one sooner (literówki)
- WYKLUCZONE (0 pkt): progress to the next level (BEZ comparative), advanced (bad tense), get higher level (nieprecyzyjne), skip the next level (= przeskoczyć POZIOM, nie do niego), finish the course quicker (cały kurs ≠ poziom), advance to the next lever (lever zamiast level - błąd znaczeniowy), go faster (nieprecyzyjne), polski język 'przeskoczyć do'
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - comparative adverbs (faster/sooner):
- faster = comparative od fast
- sooner = comparative od soon
- Po than (po luce) WYMAGANY comparative.

📖 Reference - advance to:
advance to the next level = przejść do następnego poziomu (kolokacja). NIE advance on/for the next level.
\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Bez COMPARATIVE (faster/sooner) odpowiedź jest błędna - po luce jest than is normally the case, co WYMAGA comparative.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: SPELLING level (poziom) ≠ lever (dźwignia). Klucz traktuje lever jako błąd zmieniający znaczenie.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: skip the next level (przeskoczyć poziom) ≠ move to the next level sooner (przejść do niego szybciej). Pierwsza = pomijać, druga = wcześniej dotrzeć.
\n

6.7. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
pass the (knowledge) test (lub: pass the exam, succeed in the test, come through the test successfully).

\n

Luka 6.7.: If you don't PASS THE KNOWLEDGE TEST at the end of the third or fourth level, the Academy won't refund any money.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

Kluczowy fragment z sekcji WHAT WE REQUIRE:

\n
"You must submit videos that demonstrate your skills in training specific behaviours and pass the knowledge test for each level. In the event that you fail the test, you will not be able to continue in the program. If this happens before the third level, 50% of the course fee is refundable. Otherwise, the full amount you have paid for the course is kept by the Academy."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. pass the knowledge test for each level = zdać test wiedzy.
  2. In the event that you fail the test - przeciwieństwo to pass the test.
  3. Otherwise, the full amount is kept by the Academy = jeśli nie zdasz na poziomie 3 lub 4, akademia zatrzymuje pieniądze (= won't refund).
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź pass the (knowledge) test.

\n

Sposób 2 - analiza gramatyczna luki

\n

W notatce: If you don't 6.7. at the end of the third or fourth level

\n

If you don't + V (bezokolicznik):

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.7, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - pass the (knowledge) test (forma oczekiwana)
- Akceptowane: manage to pass the test/exam, succeed in the test, pass the test (given), come through the test successfully
- Z dopuszczalnym błędem: pass test (brak rodzajnika)
- WYKLUCZONE (0 pkt): fail the test (PRZECIWNE znaczenie), submit videos (z innego pola), train specific behaviours, pay for the course, take/sit/do the test (nieprecyzyjne - można zrobić i nie zdać), meet the requirements, achieve required standard, sam pass (bez test), continue the course, submit videos and pass the knowledge test (przekroczony limit 6 wyrazów)
- Dysleksja: pas the test (akceptowane)
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - kolokacje z test/exam:
- pass the test = zdać test
- fail the test = oblać test
- take/sit the test = podejść do testu (nie wiadomo czy zda)
- do well/badly on the test = dobrze/źle wypaść

Klucz w tej luce wymaga POZYTYWNEGO efektu (zdania), bo If you don't pass = jeśli oblejesz.
\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: take the test ≠ pass the test. Pierwsze = przystąpić, drugie = zdać. Klucz wymaga ZDANIA, nie tylko przystąpienia.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: fail the test to PRZECIWIEŃSTWO - jeśli wstawisz, oznacza 'jeśli nie oblejesz' = 'jeśli zdasz', co logicznie się NIE zgadza z 'won't refund money'.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Limit 6 wyrazów - submit videos and pass the knowledge test for each level przekracza limit. Wybierz krótszą wersję.
\n

6.8. ## Poprawna odpowiedź
cost more / not be discounted (lub: cost you $1,000 more, be more expensive, cost $8,500).

\n

Luka 6.8.: If you can't afford to pay the entire amount in advance, the course will COST MORE / NOT BE DISCOUNTED.

\n

Sposób 1 - analiza tekstu

\n

Kluczowy fragment z sekcji HOW MUCH WE CHARGE:

\n
"The standard course fee is $8,500, made up of an initial payment of $3,500 upon registration, followed by $5,000 to be paid after two months. The course fee is lowered to $7,500 if the whole sum is pre-paid before the course starts."
\n

→ Wskazówki:

\n
  1. Standardowa opłata = $8,500 (gdy płacisz w ratach).
  2. Zniżka do $7,500 = gdy płacisz CAŁOŚĆ z góry.
  3. Różnica = $1,000.
  4. Jeśli NIE stać cię na całość z góry → płacisz STANDARDOWĄ kwotę = $1,000 więcej = cost more / not be discounted.
\n

→ Wniosek: odpowiedź cost more (lub not be discounted, cost $1,000 more, cost $8,500).

\n

Sposób 2 - analiza gramatyczna luki

\n

W notatce: the course will 6.8.

\n

will + V (bezokolicznik bez to):

\n\n

Schemat oceniania CKE

\n
📋 Klucz CKE - zadanie 6.8, max 1 pkt:
- 1 pkt - cost more / not be discounted (forma oczekiwana)
- Akceptowane: cost you more (in total), be more expensive (for you), cost (you) $1,000 more, cost much more, be much pricier, cost the standard amount, cost more than the pre-paid one, increase in price, amount to/cost $8,500, amount to $8,575, not be $1,000 cheaper
- Z dopuszczalnym błędem: be charged at the standard fee, have the standard fee, cost the standard fee
- WYKLUCZONE (0 pkt): be non-refundable (refundability dotyczy testów, nie ceny), be lowered to $7,500 (PRZECIWNE), not start for you, be paid after two months, allow you to pay later, cost 8,500 pounds (waluta), be slightly more expensive (nieprawidłowy stopień - różnica $1,000 NIE jest 'slight'), pay more (student płaci, nie kurs), be divided into two payments (z innego pola), be expensive (bez comparative)
- Dysleksja: be more expensiv (akceptowane)
\n

Reference

\n
📖 Reference - verb agreement (course):
Podmiotem zdania jest the course, więc czasownik dotyczy KURSU (nie studenta).
- the course will cost more (kurs będzie kosztować więcej)
- the course will be more expensive (kurs będzie droższy)
- NIE the course will pay more (kurs nie płaci)
\n

Typowe pułapki

\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Podmiotem jest the course - czasownik dotyczy KURSU, nie studenta. NIE pay more (to student płaci).
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: SLIGHT EXPENSIVE? Różnica $1,000 (z $7,500 na $8,500 = 13% więcej) NIE jest 'slightly more expensive' - klucz CKE traktuje to jako niezgodne z tekstem.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: Limit 6 wyrazów - be made up of an initial payment and followed by $5,000 przekracza limit. Wybierz cost more lub not be discounted.
\n
⚠️ Uwaga: WALUTA - tekst mówi DOLARY ($), nie funty. cost 8,500 pounds = niezgodne z tekstem.
"}]}